Hi,
I have noticed that a role having conflicting transaction codes assigned in the back end system is not propelry analyzed and in ARA application. When this role is analyzed, "No Violations" message is shown though there are conflicing transaction codes assigned.
As far risk definitaion is concerned, conflicting actions are properly defined in respective conflicting actions and thse actions are grouped in a risk, which is applicable to a logical group (which in turn has the connector included causing this problem) and they are active.
Rule are properly generated for the all the risks and functions. However, at the time of running risk analysis for this role, ARA is not showing as risk.
May any one please advise on this?
Regards,
Rehan